My first task was to calculate and rank the difference between the aforementioned moving averages and the S&P. Second was the application of a filter using the relative difference between the 20-day vs 50-day MAs, and 50-day vs 200-day MAs.
From there it was a matter of eyeballing for similar relationships from different time periods going back to 1951. The following table shows where similar such relationships (as per the MA relationships) existed in the S&P:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjK8A6pDJTGPcKq2JhGpXlfjegu3cEtF7ElK3fCSe9KG85qSVkby0HMMH28gp81CDXZ_XqC23CQFMbRnfzDH4RVIHbp6y48BPWgW3XnxMsIJCqFNYhD-PrhOPWJiloHLPJZz5vBcnU88ds0/s320/Tablesum.png)
Unfortunately, if we look at the six most recent matches to today we don't get a clear pattern as to what may follow. In the charts that follow 'closest' matches are marked with a blue arrow.
January of this year, 1982, and 2002 (to 2003) were fairly similar in markets traded in a sideways pattern for the following 6 months. In 2002 the sideways pattern continued in to 2003 when another match was made; this last match was immediately followed by a strong rally. Adding to the mix was the match of 1982 which was soon followed by the incredible bull market to 2000.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5otQ5lFiOiewEzREF2vr74g7sFK3wRtDgF00C7Emw6OFwroMCuCs-6GUnNa7mx4QwVWvFXtlyZQjwApykWGUoTgI11EzsMsy-kaVKgzBMY3CVyxkeysZdljS1hmx7dZs3K7anMlZi9Ycf/s320/SP1982.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_Eu-fNeNz-4wLH0oXpyN5nHVb1-xHa7T_B3N_P0_MWg1E06o7YRsAFCj10mpiUe6HSU3-sXekQuNBZbyNDhDzKbr4QC53TLfeD24LdwBKJN0mLVHFekv7tPgIr0Mxa-_8kbYYGKZ0h3gp/s320/SP2002.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJwbFtsbdsj2iOAbm1w6QDw6EgZ2IPWpCMRtU86Qrj1mDu51lVtKoww_ZEY1AkXvwAqF_I27i5SvAuLvIRCsL0fPRDNq22Mh8YksdEVxeKw01Yr6p0nsMx96NPs0YW4NQ0aCAIF3Wd_Ewr/s320/SP1998.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMWejcV1iu2wbFTEW24WqZGNQvIbat1o8r-4XsnECrL-up-drYPGBjOfEyogB3Hf9yTx90l1jWlb5pVzB_OXD8ABWHYYIrxy8tnPNVsmF97xGnZRLnbxZ-2YqnkzhiB6p1fz2GLuB5Yrdk/s320/SP2008.png)
As with 2003, the picture was bullish for 1998 when soon after the match a rally followed:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaY7bTuC9SD3a96ZhM9rPk4Ve6JMgT1q9QiTzDTIOWn7Oy-fNEOYUzUWt3k0Gf4AgkVUSkM9MDVTW6aagbNTofYmHRN6L-chUNkWxb-6bEd0Yki7p4-TxNMivcVb4rMAcmfW_rGlKvY-tR/s320/SP2003.png)
But before the bunting and balloons are rolled out the painful crash of 2001 lingers in the background; it had the greatest number of matches to the current picture but took the quickest and one of the hardest falls of all matches:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiO7jpNP_pOt_YGOwaGBLN8Rxn3z84ALhhUz5K7si6JuyiaMHXgz6se0IJmbc9jfPOpDYAn46bhLlYF4-uTqI0lSKBIk9iGvw9VwdQiDCnxA_B8ZMjSUXQok_Bfwb2UuYdG_0YssDADz12P/s320/SP2001.png)
The take home lesson is for the next month or two further downside is not just likely but probable; only in 2003 did a rally develop soon after the match. For the other five of the six matches the S&P lost between 7% and 30% of its value before it finally turned around.
From a buyers perspective there is little incentive to be long S&P futures or stocks until a firm break of the 200-day MA occurs.
The good news for bulls is once the S&P gets past the 200-day MA there is likely to be a very tradable rally.
---------
Thanks to AfraidtoTrade for linking this article
Dr. Declan Fallon, Senior Market Technician, Zignals.com the free stock alerts, market alerts, and stock charts website
0 comments:
Post a Comment