Showing posts with label 1929. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1929. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Find me a bull market?

While the S&P, Dow, Nasdaq and Russell run around the playground and ride the see-saw, is there a place of refuge for the responsible to take advantage and earn some money? Over at HeadlineCharts there are four 28-year charts; one shows the past 25-year rally in bond prices, another illustrates the dramatic fall in the S&P, a third highlights the nascent rally in the dollar, while the last for the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) displays recent fear but also a level of optimism and opportunity. Why?

In an US election piece at TheStockAdvisors.com a case is made for the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) assuming a McCain win. In a baby and bathwater situation we are presented with an opportunity not lost on the author:

I also continue to believe that we are still in the early stages of what will prove to be a multi-year boom for commodities, and much of the selling we have seen in gold appears to be primarily emotional reasons.

While the sentiment is correct, the vehicle of opportunity is not gold (yet!). But lets look at it in steps.

[1] The secular bull market in commodities is alive and well. What the commodity market is experiencing is a cyclical correction within a broader bull market. The stock market is also experiencing a cyclical move (not a correction) within the context of a secular bear market. While the picture of each decline is cringe worthy, the CRB index is only testing 2007 lows while the S&P is doing its best to test 2002 lows having surpassed all other support levels leading up to today.

[2] So why not gold? Three things make gold less attractive as an investment in the near term.

First, the dollar looks to have found some footing - even if this strength is only relative, i.e. other currencies are devaluing faster than the dollar. One only has to look at the ratio of the US dollar index to the Euro index to see it has moved off its 16-year low of 0.45 to its current value of 0.60 (it peaked at 1.43 in 2001).

The second reason against gold is its the only commodity to hold the bulk of its 2001 to 2008 gains; from a 2001 low of $255/oz it peaked at $1,033/oz in the early part of the year before falling back to the current price of $839/oz (18.8% loss from high / 229% gain from low). Silver, on the other hand, moved from a low of $4.01/oz in 2001 to a high of $21.44/oz and currently trades at $11.06 (48.8% loss from high / 175% gain from low). As an additional reference, oil is down 47.7% from its high of $147.90 and is currently testing its 200-week Moving Average (MA). Market bottoms only occur when everything sells off - at current valuations gold has yet to see the panic sell off which hit other commodities. Once gold sells off it will give the commodity market the ground work it needs to bottom. Gold Bugs will argue "This time is different" - as history shows, things are never different just the story changes.

The third reason to bet against gold is the behaviour of gold miner stocks. Is it any surprise to see Barrick Gold (ABX) 46% off its 52-week high? Compare it to silver miner Pan American Silver (PAAS) which is down 66% from its 52-week high. It appears investors in gold miners have already priced in a decline in gold prices. To make a simple ratio extrapolation; a 1% decline in silver equated to a 1.34% drop in PAAS. So based on the drop in ABX, gold could fall 34% (to about $682/oz). But this ignores the head-and-shoulder pattern in ABX which has a projected target of $19.11 (or a 65% drop from its 52-week high)


If the projected downward target for ABX was to hold true it could set an alternate target for gold of $531/oz (near 2006 lows). However, there is a positive side to this scenario and it's the 200-week MA. Oil prices are making an important test of its 200-week MA. Should oil succeed in holding this prior support level it would give optimism for gold to do likewise if such a test was made. Gold's 200-week MA currently trades at $649/oz - the last time Gold traded at this MA in early 2002 it broke though and kicked off the current gold bull market. The maths in this may be overly simplistic, but the perspective it provides is not.

[3] So when will it be gold?

At its simplest, when gold suffers the same way as other commodities have it will mark a bottom for all commodities. Other commodities have likely seen the worst of their losses, but until gold follows their lead they will continue to experience declines (which is why oil's test of its 200-week MA is important for the purposes of defining potential support). The global economy will eventually find its footing and industrial and energy commodity demand will slowly rise, influenced by the old and new economies of Europe, North and South America, China and India.

There is plenty of scare mongering and fear in the market, but history has shown these environments are opportunities to prosper, not panic. Emphasis is placed on time of buyers at peaks to breakeven, not on the returns made by those who took advantage of the fear to buy. Individuals who invested in 1932 would have made out like bandits by the time peak buyers broke even. However, early birds who saw the 1929 meltdown as an opportunity to buy would have suffered, given time (and inflation) would have made the 75% (or so) return to 1954 fairly meaningless.

It's for this reason we need to focus on the secular trend; not the secular bear market of stock markets, but the secular bull market of commodities. Gold looks destined to challenge $1,000 once more, but with a strengthening dollar it may fall under its own weight - if it does it will give a timing signal for a bottom. Whether this happens or not, remaining commodity prices are well off their highs and opportunities to bottom fish, industrial metals in particular, should reap dividends down the road.

We are six years into a 20-35 year secular commodity bull market - it's time to take advantage.

A list of commodity based ETFs for US and UK markets can be found here.

If there are readers interested in a copy of the annotated ABX Zignals stock chart with updated data please email me at declan-at-zignals.com.

Dr. Declan Fallon, Senior Market Technician, Zignals.com the free stock alerts, market alerts, and stock charts website

Read more!

Friday, October 10, 2008

What kind of crash have we?

Search traffic for "market crash" soared as markets worked on their daily 5% trim. Contrarians will take pleasure in this, but it doesn't ease the pain of the losses. News volume also increased sharply, another sign of saturation and capitulation.


The "1929 market crash" is the doom-and-gloom of choice for readers, followed closely by 1987. The 2000 meltdown didn't register amongst search topics.


In numeric terms we have exceeded the losses of 1987; the 36% loss in the S&P from high to low in 1987 was outdone by the 42% loss (and counting) we are now experiencing. Next on the crash watch is the 50% loss witnessed from 2000 to 2002, chief difference to this is the current loss will have occurred in about half the time it took the tech bubble to collapse.

What of 1929? The first step in 1929 saw a 48% loss for the Dow in 2 months (looking good so far) which was followed by a counter rally of 48% which took 5 months to complete. It was after this counter rally that the real pain set in.


In terms of decline structure what we have is very similar to the first phase meltdown in 1929; the precipitous drop without relief. Not even the September 2001 decline came close as the S&P then gave up 23% from August highs to September lows (albeit on the background of a year long bear market), but even this 'milder' decline was followed by a 24% rally.

The real worry will be what happens after we relief rally (based on simple historic comparisons we could come back 42% from here). The 1929 story is well covered with its 83% discount, but the much neglected 2001-2002 drop sheared off 35% from 2001 high, or 18% from the September low. In addition, the latter part of 2002 and early 2003 was spent meandering in a scrappy, soul-searching trading range. Should we put ourselves in stasis until 2010?

Can one profit, or at least protect yourself in the current environment?

Unlike 1929, there is no shortage of inverse index funds and ETFs to invest in. How future restrictions (if any) on short selling affects these remains to be seen, but when the relief bounce plays out it will be time to take a look at some of these trading vehicles as insurance against a decline in your stock portfolio, or as a straight profit trade. Key moving averages (like the 50-day and 200-day MAs) are excellent lines in the sand to buy/sell these instruments. If your favourite stock breaks on volume through its 200-day MA the chances are its confirming a new bull trend. If your favourite stock retreats off its 200-day MA, then it may be time to sell and/or load up on an inverse ETF/fund (especially if the broader market confirms).

You can use Zignals Alerts to track how your stocks perform relative to moving averages. In this case you can be alerted if a stock exceeds its 200-day MA by 1%, but you can set a second alert for a break of a 195-day MA; effectively alerting for stocks approaching their 200-day MA. If you wanted to take it a step further you can create an Advanced Alert with a volume filter (200% of 60-day SMA of Volume is a good one to try) combined with the 200-day MA break to confirm such a bullish move in a stock.


Alternatively, a Zignals Stock Chart can be set with two moving averages overlays:



Dr. Declan Fallon, Senior Market Technician, Zignals.com the free stock alerts, market alerts, and stock charts website

Read more!